Website Upgrade Incoming - we're working on a new look (and speed!) standby while we finalise the project

Tips on using this forum..

(1) Explain your problem, don't simply post "This isn't working". What were you doing when you faced the problem? What have you tried to resolve - did you look for a solution using "Search" ? Has it happened just once or several times?

(2) It's also good to get feedback when a solution is found, return to the original post to explain how it was resolved so that more people can also use the results.

Activity relationship

13 replies [Last post]
Shahzad Ahmad
User offline. Last seen 15 years 17 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 14 Feb 2008
Posts: 96
Hi

I AM USER OF P6 I HAVE A SMALL PROB. I AM MAKING NEW BASE LINE SCH.
VERY FIRST ACTIVITY IS THE STARTING MILESTONE, AND SECOND ACTIVITY IS THE KICKOFF MEETING THE RELATION FIRST ACTIVITY TO SECONED ACTIVITY FS..

HOWEVER THE START DATE OF FIRST ACTVITY AND SECOND AVTIVITY ARE SAME...

EXAMPLE

FIRST ACTIVITY -NTP START DATE 14-08-08
SECONED ACTVITY-KICK 15-08 08 BUT THE THE SATRT DATE OF SECOND ACTIVITY SAME AS 14-08-08

CAN ANY ONE LET ME ADVISE WHERE I AM INCORRECT.

THANKS
SHAHZAD

Replies

Shahzad Ahmad
User offline. Last seen 15 years 17 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 14 Feb 2008
Posts: 96
Guys i ask one question to Mr.Arnold regarding resource update he advise me to do the setting as follows.
Hello-Shahzad

From Setting -> Calculations: Under Calculactions -> Resource Assignments "Recalculate Actual Units and Cost when duration % complete changes". Meaning everytime you make progress based on duration the resource units will also changes based in your input duration % complete because duration % complete is link to units % complete. Please check the attached files. You can manually change the units % complete based on physical % complete. Try to uncheck also the "Recalculate Actual Units and Cost when duration % complete changes" from Project Detail and observe what will happen. 1. Performance % Complete = The % Complete is used to compute Earned Value and maybe based on the Activity % Complete.2. Physical % Complete = % Complete can either be user entered or calculated from the activity’s weighted steps.3. Duration % Complete = The % Complete of the Activity Duration. Computed as (Original Duration - Remaining Duration)/Original Duration * 100
Shahzad Ahmad
User offline. Last seen 15 years 17 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 14 Feb 2008
Posts: 96
Ravi

for time being problem seem to be solved with arnold Advise.

If the Starting MS have the realation with Critical
(long path)Activity then the total duration of the project will be exceed up to 1 day.due to this lag.

in that case please advise

Thanks
shahzad
A D
User offline. Last seen 4 years 2 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 20 May 2007
Posts: 1027
So, is ur problem solved now??

Arnold has suggested in post#5, to put a lag of 01day. It shud have worked then too.

Cheers,

Ravi
Shahzad Ahmad
User offline. Last seen 15 years 17 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 14 Feb 2008
Posts: 96
Hello Raviraj

Thanks for your reply.

unit of time already is : day

yes you are right even i did in P3 it is working.
in case of P6 & P5 we have to put lag then only it will be work.

Thanks
shahzad




A D
User offline. Last seen 4 years 2 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 20 May 2007
Posts: 1027
Hi Shahzad,

Whats ur Unit of Time? (Days or Hours?)

It might be in hours and u might have put lag as 01 and that might be in hours and not days.

Alternatively, Change ur timescale to hours and let us know the start and finish time in hours.

It shud work as it is in P3.

Cheers,

Raviraj
Arnold Puy
User offline. Last seen 9 years 42 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 25 Apr 2007
Posts: 1147
Hello Shahzad,

Make sure that Successor (Kickoff) has no Actual Start.

Arnold
Shahzad Ahmad
User offline. Last seen 15 years 17 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 14 Feb 2008
Posts: 96

Thanks for your requick response

i did press F9 ,but it is not working for me.

i am working in AJMAN FZE ...



here it is my email ah_shahzad@yahoo.co.uk
Arnold Puy
User offline. Last seen 9 years 42 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 25 Apr 2007
Posts: 1147
Hi,

Yes, I’m working with P6. But it is working with me. Just now I tried it. Did you press F9?

What is your Email Address?

Arnold
Shahzad Ahmad
User offline. Last seen 15 years 17 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 14 Feb 2008
Posts: 96

Hi,

YES , NTP IS THE PREDECESSOR , KICKOFF ( SUCCESSOR) OF NTP

I ALLREADY PUT 1 DAY LAG AND TRY BUT IT IS NOT WORKING,

I CHECKED MY CLEANDER AS WELL FRIDAY IS NON WORKING DAY YOU ARE RIGHT FRIDAY NO WROK.

THEN IT SHOULD COME 16-08-08

COULD YOU PLEASE TRY AT YOUR END IF YOU DO HAVE P6

PLEASE ADVISE

P3 FILE I WILL EMAIL TO YOU SOON.

Arnold Puy
User offline. Last seen 9 years 42 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 25 Apr 2007
Posts: 1147
Hi Shahjad,

I just want to clarify from you, NTP is the Predecessor or Successor? If NTP is the Predecessor, then just put 1 Day LAG, Relationship "FS" with Kickoff (Successor). Likewise, try to check your Calendar. Because here in UAE, during Friday we do not have work. 15-08-08 is Friday. So, automatically the ES of Successor will be on 16-08-08 (Saturday).

You can me e-mail to p3-fer@sixco.ae

Thanks,

Arnold

Shahzad Ahmad
User offline. Last seen 15 years 17 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 14 Feb 2008
Posts: 96
Hello .

THANKS ARNOLD.

THE SAME THINIG I DID IN P3 IT IS WORKING FINE .

MEANS THE SECOND ACTIVITY WILL BE START AFTER FINISHED THE FIRST ONE.

NTP (ACTIVTY TYPE SM) ES 14-08-08 PREDESS..

KICKKOFF ( ACTY.TASK) ES 15-08-08 FS , NTP IS THE SUCSES...

EVEN IF I PUT LAG THERE IS NO CHANGE.

COULD YOU ADVISE ME HOW I CAN FIXED THIS PROB IN P6..
THANKS
SHAHZAD
Arnold Puy
User offline. Last seen 9 years 42 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 25 Apr 2007
Posts: 1147
Hi Shahzad,

The reason why the ES of your Predecessor & Successor are the same it is because the Activity Type of your Predecessor (NTP) is “Start Milestone” which is Zero Duration. Milestones has no duration and do not consume time.


Regards,

Arnold
PINAN T.
User offline. Last seen 6 years 22 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 20 Jul 2007
Posts: 102
try to put a lag of 1