Website Upgrade Incoming - we're working on a new look (and speed!) standby while we finalise the project

Tips on using this forum..

(1) Explain your problem, don't simply post "This isn't working". What were you doing when you faced the problem? What have you tried to resolve - did you look for a solution using "Search" ? Has it happened just once or several times?

(2) It's also good to get feedback when a solution is found, return to the original post to explain how it was resolved so that more people can also use the results.

Negative Lag

16 replies [Last post]
Wed, 2005-03-16 23:47
Fritzie Lou Lapin...
User offline. Last seen 12 years 44 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 24 Feb 2004
Posts: 19
Groups: Petro-Chem / Oil & Gas
Why does Owner doesn’t allow negative lags to be applied into predecessor/successor relationships?
Top

Replies

Tue, 2005-03-29 01:13
#1
Sukumaran Subaram...
User offline. Last seen 9 years 18 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 2 Mar 2005
Posts: 229
Groups: GPC Malaysia
Believe the planners shall avoid using the negative lag with FS relationships. Try positive lag with SS relatioship and close the open end with reasonable positive lag FF relationship.

As a layman, owner might feel that negative lag with FS relationship can mislead the schedule or the logic of work is not retained.
Top
Wed, 2005-03-23 14:05
#2
Bill Guthrie
User offline. Last seen 8 years 28 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 14 Mar 2005
Posts: 262
Groups: Petro-Chem / Oil & Gas
think this issue is closed. Almost everyone agrees, only use in certain cases, and very rare.

b
Top
Wed, 2005-03-23 12:37
#3
Stephen Devaux
User offline. Last seen 1 week 5 days ago. Offline
Joined: 23 Mar 2005
Posts: 668
Groups: Content Moderators
Bernard, thanks for the link to the interesting discussion at PMI COS.

I think the simplest explanation (other than software functionality) for avoiding negative lag (in any type of relationship!) is that it triggers an activity start or finish on the basis of an event that has not yet occurred. That necessarily increases risk, as the triggering event may NEVER occur! That said, I have occasionally used negative lag in situations where I felt that any other modeling method represnted an even greater distortion.

As to the discussion at PMI COS, I’d just mention that one of the drawbacks of using any complex dependencies (SS, FF, SF) and/or lags is that it can make the task of manually computing critical path DRAG very difficult.
Top
Sun, 2005-03-20 05:57
#4
Joy Fernandes
User offline. Last seen 9 years 5 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 10
Groups: None
Negative lag is allowed only in certain cases.if the completion of an activity is delayed by its predecessor then you can never start the activity and hence the activity goes out of sequence. Eg:Commisioning of Substation if Panels are not installed.
Top
Sat, 2005-03-19 01:35
#5
Raj Maurya
User offline. Last seen 3 years 20 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Posts: 132
Groups: Petro-Chem / Oil & Gas
One more reason to not allow the contractors to use negative lag in general that the most of the time it is used for manupulation to meet the target dates initially.
Top
Sun, 2005-03-20 04:01
#6
Jaco Stadler
User offline. Last seen 18 years 5 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 8 Sep 2004
Posts: 299
Groups: None
Hi Bill
Strange Rule of Thumb.

Maybe we should ask why we us Lag. We use lag positive or negative if the schedule is not broken down to enough detail. Unfortuanatly when we start projects engineering has not been done we do high lvl schedule (Lvl 1/2/3)in this case lag is used.
Once detail is developed these lags normally drop away.
To have a rule no -lag is allowed I think is unrealistic. (You can apply a rule in lvl 3/4 schedule no - lag is allowed only if this is part of your definition for a lvl 3/4) In planning we use all kinds of Methods and if we stop using negative lags we stop using a planning method so then we can just as well stop planning.

If you ever wondered the best reason for negative lag is due to the rate of progress. This minimise cost P & G. for following contracts.



Cheers

Top
Sat, 2005-03-19 11:35
#7
Bill Guthrie
User offline. Last seen 8 years 28 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 14 Mar 2005
Posts: 262
Groups: Petro-Chem / Oil & Gas
Good Point, Thanks, Agree with your thoughts on this. As a Clent representative, we only want a honest schedule, not a "give them what the want" by playing games with lag.
Top
Thu, 2005-03-17 14:31
#8
Bill Guthrie
User offline. Last seen 8 years 28 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 14 Mar 2005
Posts: 262
Groups: Petro-Chem / Oil & Gas
yes it is. you can purchase. We use it here to define p 50 on every critical activity when developing a FEED schedule.

Was interesting to see prior discussions on -lag. Our rule of thumb is not to accept it from contractors unless thats the only way to build the schedule.

regards,b
Top
Thu, 2005-03-17 13:52
#9
Bernard Ertl
User offline. Last seen 9 years 49 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 20 Nov 2002
Posts: 757
Groups: Petro-Chem / Oil & Gas, TURNAROUND & SHUTDOWN (T/A & S/D)
Here’s a similar topic being discussed at the PMI COS:

Negative Lags of Finish to Start Relationships

Bernard Ertl
eTaskMaker Project Planning Software
Top
Thu, 2005-03-17 13:21
#10
Ronald Winter
User offline. Last seen 3 years 36 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 4 Jan 2003
Posts: 928
Groups: None
I just looked into the Primavera Knowledgebase and found that there is a small bug with Monte Carlo and negative lags on finish-to-finish relationships. The successor activity finishes on the correct day, only one minute earlier than it should. I can’t recall seeing a finish-to-finish relationship with a negative lag on any schedule that I have ever dealt with. Otherwise, I did not find any other issue mentioned. By the way, is that product even for sale anymore?

I did not see any such problems with the other Monte Carlo software sold by other vendors. Is this the only issue with negative lags?
Top
Thu, 2005-03-17 11:42
#11
Bill Guthrie
User offline. Last seen 8 years 28 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 14 Mar 2005
Posts: 262
Groups: Petro-Chem / Oil & Gas
opps was speaking of Primavera Monte Carlo 3.0

if you research it you shall find it does not like neg lag.
Top
Thu, 2005-03-17 11:37
#12
Bill Guthrie
User offline. Last seen 8 years 28 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 14 Mar 2005
Posts: 262
Groups: Petro-Chem / Oil & Gas
speaking of primavera m.c. has a problem with neg lag

only positive lag is acceptable when running m.c.
Top
Thu, 2005-03-17 11:06
#13
Ronald Winter
User offline. Last seen 3 years 36 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 4 Jan 2003
Posts: 928
Groups: None
Bill,

You say the risk analysis cannot be done on a negative lag? This is very interesting. Can you expound more on this? Thanks in advance.
Top
Thu, 2005-03-17 10:19
#14
Bill Guthrie
User offline. Last seen 8 years 28 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 14 Mar 2005
Posts: 262
Groups: Petro-Chem / Oil & Gas
As a rep for owner, we allow neg lag only is certain cases.
for example,
if preprepration for hydrotest of a line can only start 3 days prior to completion of the line, then a neg lag can be used. Reason is logical and if completion of line is delayed the prep for hydro is also delayed and in this case you can never start prep for hydro out of seq.

Having said that, we do not like the contractors to use neg lag at random, due to the fact that risk analysis cannot be done on neg lag, and your correct to say go to lower detail to show logic as activities.

hope this helps.

Top
Thu, 2005-03-17 01:48
#15
Philip Jonker
User offline. Last seen 15 years 51 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 7 Nov 2004
Posts: 852
Groups: None
Hi Guys,

What is the relationship? FS, SS or FF, the use of negative lag is only acceptable in the case of FS. Some programs such as pertmaster, does not even accept 0 lag in the instance of SS or FF, when risk analysis is carried out. What is the clients reasons, for objecting to negative lag? Is it due to a problem during risk assesment or just a personal preference?

Regards


Philip
Top
Thu, 2005-03-17 00:57
#16
Jaco Stadler
User offline. Last seen 18 years 5 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 8 Sep 2004
Posts: 299
Groups: None
I am not sure why the owner does not allow it but I THINK it has to do with the detail. If you have a high lvl schedule you apply - Lag. If you get to a detailed schedule - lag dropp away becuase of the detail. So all i think the owner is telling you if you need negative lag the activity is not broke down to enough detail.

Hope this helps

Top