Website Upgrade Incoming - we're working on a new look (and speed!) standby while we finalise the project

Tips on using this forum..

(1) Explain your problem, don't simply post "This isn't working". What were you doing when you faced the problem? What have you tried to resolve - did you look for a solution using "Search" ? Has it happened just once or several times?

(2) It's also good to get feedback when a solution is found, return to the original post to explain how it was resolved so that more people can also use the results.

FIDIC 1987 Clause 13.1

No replies
Mohammad Iqbal
User offline. Last seen 4 years 16 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 14 Sep 2011
Posts: 2
Groups: None

Dear Sirs,

This is my first request for your thoughts on below matter:

Our Contract is based on 4th edition of FIDIC 1987 as further amended in 1992. Broad changes made by way of Conditions of Particular Applications. It’s a re-measurement contract.

We have a priced BOQ item (say item A) but without quantity. We requested the Engineer for an instruction if he wanted this work done. The Engineer confirmed that work is required but contended that cost of this item is included in the testing item (separate priced BOQ item, say item B). We disagreed as the Preamble has separate scope, methods of measurement and payment for these BOQ items.

The Engineer requested break-down of priced BOQ item for testing (item B). We informed the Engineer that priced BOQ items are not subject to further review and requested the Engineer to provide reference from CoC for such requirement.

The Engineer refers to Clause 13.1 and uses “The Contractor shall comply with and adhere strictly to the Engineer's instructions on any matter, whether mentioned in the Contract or not, touching or concerning the Works”. The Engineer further states that due to our non-obedience the Engineer determines that cost of BOQ Item A is included in the priced BOQ Item B.

I request your thoughts on this issue and guidance for our next possible response please."