Website Upgrade Incoming - we're working on a new look (and speed!) standby while we finalise the project

Tips on using this forum..

(1) Explain your problem, don't simply post "This isn't working". What were you doing when you faced the problem? What have you tried to resolve - did you look for a solution using "Search" ? Has it happened just once or several times?

(2) It's also good to get feedback when a solution is found, return to the original post to explain how it was resolved so that more people can also use the results.

I thought I was good...

31 replies [Last post]
Nigel Winkley
User offline. Last seen 28 weeks 4 days ago. Offline
Joined: 11 May 2006
Posts: 187
Groups: The GrapeVine
I had a look a couple of members profiles recently. I was surprised to see that some people are experts in everything! All stars complete, nothing they are not fully competent in.

Me? I am good at some things but have no knowledge of other areas/disciplines.

Am I too honest? Or just truthful?

How honest are you?

Nige

Replies

Charleston-Joseph...
User offline. Last seen 3 years 14 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 10 Jul 2005
Posts: 1347
Groups: None
Hello Clive,

I love what you did for PP.

If only we can be focus on why we bother to do this in PP, then and only then, we will find fullfilment in your activities.

I think it should not be charlie 13. I know this is sarcasm. It will only invite more sarcasm. It is also not appropriate to use clive 13 although you are the author/editor.

How about if we will call it PP 13. If we use PP then, others can edit what clive done until it will be perfect for all PP member to embrace. It could be PP member mantra, or the way of life of PP.

I will recommend this post to be the best ever post for the week, then for the month then, maybe for the year.

Cheers,

Charlie
Clive Randall
User offline. Last seen 16 years 46 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 744
Groups: None
Charlie
Had some time to think about your response over the weekend
Note that your advice generally revolves around simplistic solutions, and often shys away from hands on planning advice.
While I do not wish to be childish I would note that the reason in my opinion (i wont use the word honest as I am always this)for planning planet is to share our experiences, that means, what worked, what didnt, what are the problems and perhaps the solutions.
While I appreciate your efforts the continual skirting of the issues by adding generics is less than helpfull. Charlie I know you can do it role up your sleeves and provide some solutions instead of generalisations. Our younger or less experienced members are sure to appreciate facts rather than globalisations.
and to add the last word to the "sage"???

1 Corinthians 13:1-13
If I speak in the tongues of men and angels,
but have not love,
I have become sounding brass or a tinkling symbol.

And if I have prophecy and know all mysteries and all knowledge,
and if I have all faith so as to remove mountains,
but have not love, I am nothing.

And if I dole out all my goods, and
if I deliver my body that I may boast
but have not love, nothing I am profited.

Love is long suffering,
love is kind,
it is not jealous,
love does not boast,
it is not inflated.

It is not discourteous,
it is not selfish,
it is not irritable,
it does not enumerate the evil.
It does not rejoice over the wrong, but rejoices in the truth


It covers all things,
it has faith for all things,
it hopes in all things,
it endures in all things.

Love never falls in ruins;
but whether prophecies, they will be abolished; or
tongues, they will cease; or
knowledge, it will be superseded.

For we know in part and we prophecy in part.

But when the perfect comes, the imperfect will be superseded.

When I was an infant,
I spoke as an infant,
I reckoned as an infant;

when I became [an adult],
I abolished the things of the infant.

For now we see through a mirror in an enigma, but then face to face. Now I know in part, but then I shall know as also I was fully known.

But now remains
faith, hope, love,

these three;

but the greatest of these is love.

So after having read this are we saying

1 Charlies 13:1-13
If I speak in the tongues of planners and project managers,
but do not love planning,
I have become sounding brass or a tinkling symbol.

And if I have prophecy and know all mysteries and all knowledge regarding planning,
and if I have all faith that the job will be completed on time,
but I do not love planning, I am nothing.

And if I dole out all my knowledge regarding planning, and
if I deliver my body that I may boast about my CPM skills
but have no love of planning, nothing I am profited.

Love of planning is long suffering,
love of planning is kind,
it is not jealous,
love of planning leads us not to boast,
it is not inflated.

It is not discourteous,
it is not selfish,
it is not irritable,
it does not enumerate the evil.
It does not rejoice over the wrong, but rejoices in the truth


It covers all things,
it has faith for all things,
it hopes in all things,
it endures in all things.

Love of planning never falls in ruins;
but whether prophecies, they will be abolished; or
tongues, they will cease; or
knowledge, it will be superseded.

For we know in part and we prophecy in part.

But when the perfect comes, the imperfect will be superseded and yeh will will have a truly great programme.

When I was an assistant planner,
I spoke as an assistant planner,
I reckoned as an assistant planner;

when I became planning manager,
I forgot the things of an assistant planner.

For now we see through a computer the errors of our earlier programmes, as they were completed. Now I know in part my errors, as I have now experience and with the help of planning planet I will share this experience then all of planning will be fully known by all.

But until the time when this occurs what remains is
faith, hope, and love of planning,

these three;

but the greatest of these is the love of planning.

I make no apologies for the original text which appears to have watered down some of the stronger versions but I have now printed Charlies 13 and have it by my computer less I commit such evil as to backslide into phrases such as why do I bother, whats the point etc, because yeh I have now found the reason why I do this.

LOL
Clive
Oscar Wilde
User offline. Last seen 16 years 37 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 7 Oct 2005
Posts: 166
Groups: None
PS Charlie
Ever done a data centre us ignorants consider that pretty complex maybe as complex as plumbing up a petro plant
Oscar
Oscar Wilde
User offline. Last seen 16 years 37 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 7 Oct 2005
Posts: 166
Groups: None
"simply the best coz PP says so"
Oh dear oh dear
Charlie this is not what planet are you from but planning planet
I am no good I am ignorant
cos I shout and scream and annoy people in my efforts to get people to listen to my plan
Im not a cymbol Im a drum set
However I have a little faith some charity and hopefully from time to time some love, the realtionship with this verse and planning however really eldudes me
Are you saying you are JC ?? surely not I thought you were JUST a planner but maybe JC was a planner he certainly took a seriously critical path but people still talk about his work and they listened so maybe he was the ultimate planner but I think not
OOh soooo sorry am I being childish is humour childish an interesting concept.
Star rating bo derick not the one Arther new but a crane in east london receives a 10
any way Charlie I will give you a 10 for making me scream with laughter at your posts.
Best regards
Oscar Wild
Clive Randall
User offline. Last seen 16 years 46 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 744
Groups: None
Charlie
Corinthians 13 old sage ?????
Like your interpretation of the meaning
Do I love planning?????
Are Civil Engineers and builders ignorant, Im not sure perhaps they will respond in due course to your assertion
Have I worked in petrochemical not really only spent 6 months with Shell on an LNG loading facility and I dont really think that was petrochem not really. So put myself in the ignorant builders box and look in awe at the planning ability of the petrochem planning gods.
But you know me Charlie our swords have crossed before and I believe that labourers make good planners if they have the mental skills and wish to become one.
To go back to another thinker
LDV bastard son of a rich Italian
No formal education but considered one of the greatest minds of all time because his mind remained uncluttered by the ideas of others, and he was able to think outside the box because he didnt know there was a box because nobody had told him there was. Maybe an ignorant Civil Engineer could in fact do petrochem planning if he was able to read, communicate and had a logical mind, maybe just maybe he would be good at it and award himself 10 stars.
But Charlie why you not share, why you not bring the "loaves and finishes" why you soooo shy regarding your experiences cymbals have their place as long as they dont bash on and on, to say so much but to provide so little is frustrating to all.

Clive
Charleston-Joseph...
User offline. Last seen 3 years 14 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 10 Jul 2005
Posts: 1347
Groups: None
Hi Clive,

WOW that an achievement.

It practically dwraf my experience, so I dont want to say more.

I don’t want to spoil your memories in PP.

In addition to what you been thru, mine is on a smaller scale. I’m involved only is an 5 BIllION USD Light Rail Proposal. Also, I have Oil and Gas Experience, an experienced which I’m not proud off, which I should not have got into in the first place.

But then, the oil and gas experience also help me understand the nature of the work that a purely building boys are not familiar. In some discussion with civil guys, it is intimidating to open up topics (Oil and Gas, LNG, Petrochemical and Industrial Construction) that scare them because of their ignorance.

For me the rating is nothing because I have seen a lot of people overate themselves to the point of becomming fantastic and humorous.

As a good sage said two thousand years ago "what knowledge I learn will come to an end ... Only three things will last >>>>, >>>>, & <<< and the greatest is LOVE".

For me whatever a person throw in PP but then done other than for the love of Planning and for the love of sharing, what that person said is nothing, "a clanging cymbal". It only serve that person sense of grandeur, pride, etc. that cause a lot of conflict in the forum.

But do it for the LOVE of planning or for the LOVE of sharing to others, then and only then you will find fullfilment in what your are doing here in PP.

You don’t even have to think "I thought I was good ..." for SIMPLY YOU ARE THE BEST. PP will know.

Cheers, have a nice day


Charlie
Clive Randall
User offline. Last seen 16 years 46 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 744
Groups: None
Dear all
In a fit of irrational childish churlishness I have decided to come out of the closet for nothing and therefore do not have to pay 4.99 pounds.
While I fully understand the anachronism of the earth being like my star rating as much as my little toe is part of my body I will begin. I will attempt to be unemotional and try to not make the fatal error of imagining that a milestone has a duration allthough reference to Stephen Hawkins may result in this statement being proved as falacious.

So why my star rating.
1 I accept that I am a total genius and that those around me are less superior beings.
2 I dont perceive myself as arrogant just correct all the time.
3 I have never made a mistake that I will own up to
4 I believe that generally all planners are a superbreed and only have to see a job to understand it intimately.
5 I would give myself a ten in everything but I just cant be bothered.

But what of coming clean
Airports my star rating 8 reason worked on preliminary programme for stansted, worked on master programme for Chek Lap Kok, worked on master programme for Hyderabad, however was not involved in daily site operations just carried the tender and bailed out somwhere about three months in to the contract. So can only award myself 8.
Bridge building worked on two major cable stayed projects one as the JV planning manager one as the bid manager. One is the longest cable stayed road and rail the other is a very major crossing. Think Im good but only still awarded an 8 as only spent 4 years doing it.
Building services and E&M have wide experience gained over the last 20 years of varying systems particuarly experienced in hospitals and it dont get much harder than that but am not full time E&M planner so only an 8
Building works this is my baby over 25 years of planning covering just about everything probably planned or tendered over 250 projects from 80 storey high rise to major airports. Lead a team of 10 planners in a Company that turns over about 800 million pounds a year. So I give myself a ten.
Demolition works have been responsible for numerous planning assingements on high rise demolition but never been hands on as regards site, so only a 5.
Fit out did the largest fit out at the time in the UK in 1990 have since been responsible for several major hotel fit outs. Total value of fit out projects been directly responsible for well over 1 billion pounds. Still only an 8
Forensic worked as expert witness, and have been involved with several multi million arbitrations still only a five cos never made a career of it.
Heavty civils worked on major bridge railway roads power station harbour projects but its not my first love even though in total over 7 years hands on planning experience. Only a seven
Railway as PM on a 300 million pound two station project built over a river. Plus a railway on a cable stayed bridge. So good experience here. still only an 8
Railway and infrastructure see above
So after 30 years in construction 24 of which has been in planning having worked on four continents on major projects I only rate myself as a 10 in one subject.
Thats because Im shy so what about you all
Charlie Nige etc whats your story
Why are you so great????
Clive

Nigel Winkley
User offline. Last seen 28 weeks 4 days ago. Offline
Joined: 11 May 2006
Posts: 187
Groups: The GrapeVine
James

Going home in a sulk? Can’t take a joke?

Tut tut

Me? Two wheels, manic London Drivers, even more crazy bikers...yup that includes me

TTFN
James Griffiths
User offline. Last seen 15 years 43 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 19 May 2006
Posts: 435
Groups: None
Well Nigel, if you don’t like what’s on telly, then you can always press the Off-button.....so there! (all in the best possible taste, of course!).
I, for one, jus lurve these discussions of utter childish, playground toilet humour and double-entendre. I just don’t get enuff silliness in my life.

I’m going to go home: compartment number 13, here I come.
Nigel Winkley
User offline. Last seen 28 weeks 4 days ago. Offline
Joined: 11 May 2006
Posts: 187
Groups: The GrapeVine
I refuse to get drawn into an on-going puerile discussion along these lines...expecially with southern jessies;-)

Think this thread should be closed!
James Griffiths
User offline. Last seen 15 years 43 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 19 May 2006
Posts: 435
Groups: None
eeehh by ’eck lad. Where’s me Ecky Thump. We’ll all ’ave a good ’ead slappin. All boys together now.......PUSH.
Nigel Winkley
User offline. Last seen 28 weeks 4 days ago. Offline
Joined: 11 May 2006
Posts: 187
Groups: The GrapeVine
Not being the politically correct, sharing, caring type...how about a group slap up side the head? Especially for those attempting to extort vast amounts of money from forum members? I remember when £4.99 would buy you a new ’orse ’n’ cart, new ’ouse, three nights out, a good meal, four flagons of ale and still give you change! But you try telling youngsters today that...they won’t believe you

(Apollogies to Monty Python)
James Griffiths
User offline. Last seen 15 years 43 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 19 May 2006
Posts: 435
Groups: None
You like a good mouthful also, whilst skipping during a group-hug? That’ll be door number 1....and we charge extra.
Julian Coetzee
User offline. Last seen 17 years 46 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 2 Jun 2006
Posts: 23
Groups: None
Cor! That was a mouthful!!! Make sure the twirly wirly is ironed hey! He! He!
James Griffiths
User offline. Last seen 15 years 43 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 19 May 2006
Posts: 435
Groups: None
Oooohh Julian...you would like us to skip with a group-hug! I’ll ask my CEO if we can include that on the curriculum. Hold on just a moment, I’ll open my mental compartment door number......265! A Yes, here we are! Halloooo....anybody in there?................................................................................................................................................................................Good news, Young Bean. We can Hop, Skip and Jump. Twirly-skirts are compulsory though. Here you go...you can borrow mine; I’ve got plenty of them........................

Oops, sorry. That was door number 264.....my feminine side!
Julian Coetzee
User offline. Last seen 17 years 46 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 2 Jun 2006
Posts: 23
Groups: None
What is the latest exchange rate - Pounds to Rand? You could make some bucks there hey? I will skip the group hug though!
James Griffiths
User offline. Last seen 15 years 43 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 19 May 2006
Posts: 435
Groups: None
Shall we all have a group-hug?

Maybe we could start-up "Planners Annonymous"...for those whom are emotionally disturbed, suffer from delusions of grandeur or a sense of inadequacy.

"Come hither to Planning Planet, unburden yourself, allow yourself to be the real you. Reveal your hidden depths and talents without fear of mockful abuse. Ye shall not be judged but by only the Star Rating". Only £4.99 per session, with the first seesion free.

Rhetorical, sarcastic...ME.....nah!!
Julian Coetzee
User offline. Last seen 17 years 46 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 2 Jun 2006
Posts: 23
Groups: None
Hi there Nige

It was a valid point you brought up! I have been in this game for a little of 3.5 years and nearly everyday, I learn something new! As far as I am concerned, if can learn something new as often as possible, then I have achieved something great, that makes a good planner!

I am really enjoying this site, the guys out there have taught me a lot, that is right as rain in my books!

Cheers!
Nigel Winkley
User offline. Last seen 28 weeks 4 days ago. Offline
Joined: 11 May 2006
Posts: 187
Groups: The GrapeVine
Really stirred something up here, didn’t I?!

It was meant as a semi-sarcastic post/rhetorical question. I was surprised though that so many planners thoought that they were excellent at everything.

Even the most self-centred must realise that there are some things that they do not know. Ask a, very good, civils planner how he would build and oil-rig or, someone like me, an old git that has been around a while but specialised in M&E, how they would work out an IT project and whilst we would both have an idea we would not be competent.

I can admit that, most people can, so why the self-delusion? Or are they trying to project a certain image to their peers? If I don’t know something, hands-up "I don’t know".

Am I that different? Or have I the ability to realise my own short-comings, lack of knowledge and admit it.

I would have much more confidence in someone that did not fill it in at all.

Imagine a prospective employer looking at this site - as I know some do. If they looked at the rating, who do you think they would really go for?

Having had that little rant, I’ll shut up and try and think of a less contentious post for the future :-}

Cheers

Nige
Julian Coetzee
User offline. Last seen 17 years 46 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 2 Jun 2006
Posts: 23
Groups: None
James

Refering to the last line in your statement about gettting a new job...you demonstrated a good sence of honesty there, so I am sure you will come right! He! He!
Charleston-Joseph...
User offline. Last seen 3 years 14 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 10 Jul 2005
Posts: 1347
Groups: None
Hi Nigel,

What you perceive in planning planet refering to your post #1 is similar to the planet earth. There is not much difference. I encountered a lot of this kind of person. Some even got senior position but cannot differentiat an activity or a milestone (the senior planner think that milestone got duration, so funny).

The basic in PP is freedom, even to the extent that others becomes gullible.

The best indicator is how a particular PP member post in the forum. For he/she could be the best that he/she think. But.. But read his/her post. If it sound childish or there is no planning thoughts or if that someone deginerate and got emotional to the point of acting immature or foolishly, then, i believe the majority of PP members knows how to evaluate such personality.


Cheers,


Charlie
James Griffiths
User offline. Last seen 15 years 43 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 19 May 2006
Posts: 435
Groups: None
Nigel,

I will agree with you on most points. In Para 5, however, we have to be a bit careful with regard to our perceptions. Yes, a £2.5Billion over-run, in its absolute value sounds very high, but still it’s only 10%. However such inaccuracies are related to the levels of uncertainty, based on the total cost value and duration of the project (I’m sure that there’s a statistical equation somewhere), so a 10% error is just that: 10%. One would, I suspect, expect a £2K, 1-week project to have substantially less error, owing to the fact that its absolute value is small and duration is short. Whether one works on proportion or absolute values is down to the individual, but I must admit that it can be very difficult to interweave such opposing philosophies. A classic example is my bathroom refurbishment: It hasn’t progressed, even though I can afford anything I want to: but because I’m a stingy-git, I want the lowest possible cost relative to the functional requirements, so we spend too much time faffing-around with indecision in order to save £50 quid here and there. Ok, so I squeeze the budget to its minimum, and it’s not actually costing me more by delaying the refurbishment (unless you account for the additional running-around to different shops), but relative to the total cost, saving £400 is less than 10%.......but I’m certainly not enticed to spend extra money just because there’s a 10% price-reduction (which logically contradicts my other philosophy). Tis always a balance between programme and cost – and the principle will apply to any size of project.

Back to being a good planner: Proud to be associated with a major engineering project……hmmm!!!!; even though it might have been an abject failure in terms of cost and programme adherence. Problem there is when looking for a new job. One can only hope that the interviewer hasn’t heard of the project :-)

Cheers.

James.
Nigel Winkley
User offline. Last seen 28 weeks 4 days ago. Offline
Joined: 11 May 2006
Posts: 187
Groups: The GrapeVine
James

I don’t think it is a case of how good we think a planner is, but how good they think they are. Anyone can tick all the stars but it doesn’t mean they are any good. I intended the original to be a semi-sarcastic comment but think that the rating becomes meaningless if everyone says they are brilliant.

Regarding you comments about how good a plan is, tricky one. We have all probably flagged up to management that a project will be in trouble unless x, y, z. I think the "good" planners are the ones that can effectively communicate that idea and get management to act upon it.

We can all say, and some always do, this is crap, it’s not going to work. Surely the good planners are the ones that then come up with a solution or two and a methodology for implementing them.

If a project comes in on time and budget, the planner is either excellent, lying or not that good. Why didn’t it come in under budget and before time? Would that be a better planner?

Within 10% - fair enough, but on a 17 year $25billion job that is an awfully big over-run and over-spend! On a £2000 week’s project, it’s ok.

The best that can be done should be the criteria. Bearing in mind the circumstances, conditions and so on. And the best means of judging that? Would you be proud to put on your CV that I built that/worked on that/whatever. If you can say Yes, then that’s a good plan.
James Griffiths
User offline. Last seen 15 years 43 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 19 May 2006
Posts: 435
Groups: None
An interesting thought: By what criteria should we judge how good a planner is? Having been involved in lots of stuff for lots of time doesn’t mean that we’re any good at it. Take driving a car for example: how many Old Fogies have been driving for 60 years…and are still a danger to everyone else.

I’d imagine that it’s a very difficult thing to define. For instance, if our programme forecasts a conflict a year into the future, and that conflict comes to fruition, then you could say that was brilliant planning from one perspective. On the flip-side you could also say that one obviously didn’t do a very good job of communicating this conflict and persuading the Management that they’d better do something about it. However, there is perhaps, in your company, a level of management apathy toward taking seriously any planning advice, especially if it conflicts with their own gut-feel viewpoint.

Does anyone have a rule-of-thumb: say, if your project comes to within plus/minus 10% of the time & cost that was projected at the outset, then that would be excellent/good/crap planning. Obviously one needs to account for a continually evolving situation (especially in Design Planning)……therefore at some point it’s a case of “all-bets-are-off” and we start again. We all appreciate that, technically, if the scope changes then we should re-baseline, and all previous costs/duration forecasts become null-and-void…..but do you know of any rule-of-thumb that determines at what point you say enough-is-enough, shout “foul” and strongly suggest a re-baseline?

Experiences please….

James.
Chris Oggham
User offline. Last seen 9 years 45 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 20 May 2004
Posts: 605
Groups: None
Hi Guys,

I think Clive got it right in his post #3, that’s why I didn’t bother filling in any ratings. Like Julian said, if you can help somebody you do it, and your "star rating" is a matter of indifference.

Chris Oggham
Julian Coetzee
User offline. Last seen 17 years 46 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 2 Jun 2006
Posts: 23
Groups: None
Well, here is a churp from a new comer. This is a brilliant web site that in a short span of time has taught me some useful things. Frankly, I don’t care about some other blokes ratings. If any of these okes can help me and maybe I can help them...by all means!!!

Thanks to everyone for a cool web site!!!!

Cheers!
James Dowden
User offline. Last seen 16 years 35 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 2 May 2006
Posts: 4
Groups: None
Although my membership only shews from May 2006, I’ve been using Planning Planet for many years, and I just didn’t bother to fill the whole thing. I find the whole thing kinda tedious, and just a bit pointless. The only part of planning I haven’t been involved in is forensic and I have no intention to either.
Clive Randall
User offline. Last seen 16 years 46 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 744
Groups: None
James I note that even though you are multidisciplined youhave not filled 10 stars for every catergory. For me to get the full star rating I would expect to have worked on more than one major catergory project at a senior level but thats just my thought
Clive
James Dowden
User offline. Last seen 16 years 35 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 2 May 2006
Posts: 4
Groups: None
I’ve always worked in multi-disciplines, I don’t see the problem
Clive Randall
User offline. Last seen 16 years 46 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 744
Groups: None
I think you can have the full star rating if you once met somebody who knew somebody who had worked on that type of work. I dont think you have to know how to do it yourself.
Alternatively you may just be a genius
Marcio Sampaio
User offline. Last seen 12 years 9 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 7 Nov 2005
Posts: 658
I also noticed this ...