Website Upgrade Incoming - we're working on a new look (and speed!) standby while we finalise the project

Tips on using this forum..

(1) Explain your problem, don't simply post "This isn't working". What were you doing when you faced the problem? What have you tried to resolve - did you look for a solution using "Search" ? Has it happened just once or several times?

(2) It's also good to get feedback when a solution is found, return to the original post to explain how it was resolved so that more people can also use the results.

Float Values (I’m new to Openplan)

3 replies [Last post]
Tue, 2009-04-07 15:53
will williams
User offline. Last seen 10 years 11 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 13 Feb 2007
Posts: 4
Groups: None
I am having troubles with float values in projects. Let’s say I place a Finish No Later Than date on the critical deliverable. If the activity is negative the float runs through the project as I would expect. However when there is positive float on the critical deliverable the float value in the project is zero, even when finishing early.
The bottom line is if anyone can offer basic steps to determine the longest path (or critical path)with relative float values I would appreciate it greatly.

thanks again,
Wayne
Top

Replies

Wed, 2009-04-08 06:06
#1
Gary Whitehead
User offline. Last seen 5 years 25 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 24 Mar 2009
Posts: 1215
Groups: Building Information Modelling, Content Moderators, Petro-Chem / Oil & Gas, The GrapeVine
It’s been a while, but I think this is right:

The ’finish no later than’ constraint constrains the dates of the activity, not the float. In the absence of a project completion target date, Open Plan assumes it is equal to the Early finish of the final activity for calulating total float, hence you never get a positive project float.
(NB: I think the final activities ’free float’ will be the number you are looking for in this situation, but that’s a bit of a fudge)

You can assign a target finish date to the project from the ’project properties’ menu

Or you can use a ’target finish’ type of constraint instead of a ’finish no later than’ on your final activity. (NB: but not the ’fixed target’ type. This type basically says "this activity will finish on this date, regardless of logic or progress")

HTH

G
Top
Mon, 2009-04-27 17:02
#2
Paul Smith
User offline. Last seen 13 years 26 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 14 Feb 2007
Posts: 15
Groups: None
Hi Will,
I’m guessing here but what I think you are seeing is the worst Case Float. If the Critical milestone is the last activity in the schedule then the float between this activity and the end of the schedule will be zero as the end date of the project is the same as the end date of this activity.
If you set a Project end date beyond the critical milestone then you will see a positive float value, ie contingency.
Top
Mon, 2009-04-27 13:55
#3
Samer Zawaydeh
User offline. Last seen 5 years 38 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 3 Aug 2008
Posts: 1664
Groups: Civil Engineering, Regional Representatives
Dear Will,

The simplist and best way to understand the CPM is to use the Finish-to-start relationships.

A simple check of the internet will provide you with plenty of information; I found this one quickly.

http://courses.washington.edu/outfox/Rosemary.pdf

From the basics you can gradually increase the difficulty of the relationship and the use of leads and lags and build up a program to suite your project.

Hope it will help.

Best,

Samer
Top