(1) Explain your problem, don't simply post "This isn't working". What were you doing when you faced the problem? What have you tried to resolve - did you look for a solution using "Search" ? Has it happened just once or several times?
(2) It's also good to get feedback when a solution is found, return to the original post to explain how it was resolved so that more people can also use the results.
Dear Experts
Project Scenario - 80% Planned duration surpassed , contractor providing further structural design changes to Sub-contract(**MEP) with existing delay events from contractor i.e ( late civil clearance, civil rework impact and pending approval for delivarables)
Please advise which is the better Delay claim methodology to implement in this type of scenario : As planned + As impacted OR as-built vs as impacted OR Window analysis ( P6 : Approved Baseline or Recovery programme (-) total set of delay events impacting = total duration required to complete overall project)
**Note : My client is MEP subcontractor
Rgds
Ajay
Printer-friendly version
Send to friend
Thanks Mike for the advise.
rgds
Ajay
Hi Ajay
How complete are your as built records?
How responsive is the baseline programme?
What are your contract terms?
These are just a few of the things that need to be considered when selecting a dely analysis method.
The one method that works when there is no critical path and only rudimentary as built data is the Projected As Built method.
A demonstration is available for download from my website - www.expertdelayanalysis.com - for £35.00.
Best regards
Mike Testro
Email: PPadmin@planningplanet.com
Replies