Website Upgrade Incoming - we're working on a new look (and speed!) standby while we finalise the project

Tips on using this forum..

(1) Explain your problem, don't simply post "This isn't working". What were you doing when you faced the problem? What have you tried to resolve - did you look for a solution using "Search" ? Has it happened just once or several times?

(2) It's also good to get feedback when a solution is found, return to the original post to explain how it was resolved so that more people can also use the results.

CONCURRENT DELAY

3 replies [Last post]
Sooraj G Othayoth
User offline. Last seen 16 years 37 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 29 Dec 2004
Posts: 18
Groups: None
Hi,
I have a problem in which there is a contractor delay and employer delay for a particular activity. Both these have independent critical path delays (negative total float). TF of employer delay is less than that of contractor though both are negative. (say -25 for employer activity and -50 for contractor activity).
Can the employer ask for EOT and apportionment from employer in this case.
sooraj

Replies

Roger Gibson
User offline. Last seen 7 years 9 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 1 Jun 2001
Posts: 71
Sooraj,

If the contract is silent on concurrent delays, then don’t mention it. Just make a submission for an EOT based on the Employer caused delay.


Roger
Sooraj G Othayoth
User offline. Last seen 16 years 37 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 29 Dec 2004
Posts: 18
Groups: None
thks Roger,
In my case the contract remains silent on concurrent delays. What happens under such situations
sooraj
Roger Gibson
User offline. Last seen 7 years 9 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 1 Jun 2001
Posts: 71
Sooraj,

According to most forms of contract, the Contractor is entitled to an EOT for the Employer delay, regardless of any concurrent delay caused by himself.

However, it is not the same for damages. The Contractor should identify & isolate the costs associated with the Employer caused delay. In practice, this is not so simple as it sounds.

Roger Gibson