There seem to be an increasing number of articles and other writings that suggest that the dimensions beyond the 3rd in BIM (don't get me started on what a poor acronym that is as well!) have been allocated to certain types of information - they haven't so far in any internationally or nationally agreed way and probably don't need to be. Discuss?
Member for
14 years 7 months
Member for14 years7 months
Submitted by gr*****@s***** on Wed, 2012-05-23 00:37
I agree, anything labeled more than 4D is outside the bounds of accepted practice and has entered the realm of marketing and left reality. Even the term 4D is questionable, but time is accepted as the 4th dimension. What are the field trades nD+1?
Comments
Member for
14 yearsnD BIM
There seem to be an increasing number of articles and other writings that suggest that the dimensions beyond the 3rd in BIM (don't get me started on what a poor acronym that is as well!) have been allocated to certain types of information - they haven't so far in any internationally or nationally agreed way and probably don't need to be. Discuss?
Member for
14 years 7 monthsI agree, anything labeled
I agree, anything labeled more than 4D is outside the bounds of accepted practice and has entered the realm of marketing and left reality. Even the term 4D is questionable, but time is accepted as the 4th dimension. What are the field trades nD+1?