I disagree that Contractor should have its own area - it is an exact copy of P3ec but with an activity count limitation. Everything that pertains to P3ec also pertains to Contractor. I propose that we just add the name "Contractor" to the existing section name.
I also fee that the name change (again) is stupid. P3e became P3e/c which became P3ec (the slash caused problems with html.)Now we are supposed to call P3ec "Primavera Engineering and Construction." (I though that the names for my software were long.) NO ONE is going to want to say this but just as with MS Word, no one is going to just call it "Engineering and Construction" as this means something else to everyone. Perhaps we will just settle for calling it "Primavera E&C." Once we get used to that, it will be called "E&C". THAT means something else to everyone and so Primavera will go on another re-naming jag again!
Member for
22 years 10 monthsRE: Primavera Contractor
I disagree that Contractor should have its own area - it is an exact copy of P3ec but with an activity count limitation. Everything that pertains to P3ec also pertains to Contractor. I propose that we just add the name "Contractor" to the existing section name.
I also fee that the name change (again) is stupid. P3e became P3e/c which became P3ec (the slash caused problems with html.)Now we are supposed to call P3ec "Primavera Engineering and Construction." (I though that the names for my software were long.) NO ONE is going to want to say this but just as with MS Word, no one is going to just call it "Engineering and Construction" as this means something else to everyone. Perhaps we will just settle for calling it "Primavera E&C." Once we get used to that, it will be called "E&C". THAT means something else to everyone and so Primavera will go on another re-naming jag again!