SF
Forum Sponsor
Top Posters
Dimitrios Theocharidis
3 posts
MichaelFuelsC
0 posts
anwar zeb
1 posts
olva seselima
1 posts
Muhammd Muneer
0 posts
sairam
0 posts
MARAT BILYALOV
0 posts
RichTea66
0 posts
Muneer Muhammad
1 posts
Manny Onifade
5 posts
Hi Rashid,
I am intrested in obtaining the PDF file also, please send it to [email protected]
Thanks
Eiman Chebaro
DEAR RASHID,
I WONDER IF U CAN SEND THIS PDF FILE FOR ME,
THAT WILL BE VERY NICE.
MY EMAIL : [email protected]
REGARDS,
MEDO
Thanks Frank.
I totally agree that Zero Free Float is very good and quite logical though it works good in schedules that do not require resource levelling. Try it with resource levelling and you would see that sprinkling will not tail follow rolling.
If you know as to how i can attach a pdf with this forum posting, kindly let me know and i will attach a sample which would give you a better idea of what i am trying to say.
Best Regards
Rashid Iqbal
I would use a FS with ZFF (as late as possible) constraint rather than a SF. Due to the short activity durations in your example you are unlikely to experience the issues encountered when activities are executed out of sequence, the schedule is updated to reflect whats happened and you get illogical dates on these activities. Having helped several planners resolve this I am not a big fan of SF.